Dan Williams has narrated 5 audiobooks on Listento.it by 6 authors. The most-rated is The Trump Middle East Marshall Plan: 2019 Congressional Oversight Reports.

On January 12, 2021, the majority staff of the House Judiciary Committee released the first public staff report detailing the events of January 6, 2021, when insurrectionists broke into the US Capitol. The event occurred as the House and the Senate met in a Joint Session of Congress, with the Vice President presiding, to count the Electoral College’s votes for President. In response, the House of Representatives called for the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump. The report details the history, purpose, and meaning of the Constitution’s Impeachment Clause, and establishes that President Trump’s conduct as set forth in the Article of Impeachment satisfies the standard for high Crimes and Misdemeanors. The majority staff of the House Judiciary Committee prepared this report for the use of the House Rules Committee to accompany H. RES. 24, Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for High Crimes and Misdemeanors.
©2021 Timberlane Media (P)2021 Timberlane Media

The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is of consequence because of the enormous judicial power the Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. To receive appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the president and then confirmed by the Senate. Although not mentioned in the Constitution, an important role is played midway in the process (after the president selects, but before the Senate considers) by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Specifically, the Judiciary Committee, rather than the Senate as a whole, assumes the principal responsibility for investigating the background and qualifications of each Supreme Court nominee, and typically the committee conducts a close, intensive investigation of each nominee. This report explains the process that has occurred since the late 1960s during the Judiciary Committee’s consideration of a Supreme Court nominee. It provides detail on the three distinct stages: (1) a pre-hearing investigative stage, (2) public hearings, and concluding with (3) a committee decision on what recommendation to make to the full Senate.
©2020 Barry J. McMillion (P)2020 Timberlane Media

This third edition of The Mueller Report, released on November 9, 2020, was compiled using the FOIA-Processed Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election. Previously redacted material was released in June 2020 related Roger Stone and additional unredacted information was released by the Department of Justice in November about the Russian interference efforts. This version of the report has been edited to improve previous editions of the Mueller Report by removing references to legal material, appendices, and footnotes within the full report. Added are references to the approximate length of the redacted material to help with the listening experience for The Mueller Report audio podcast. Volume one of this report details the Special Counsel’s investigation that established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. Volume two of this report describes actions the President of the United States took towards the ongoing FBI investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election and related matters that raised questions about whether he had obstructed justice.
Public Domain (P)2020 Timberlane Media

If you are looking for increase your way to reasoning, here you will learn how to think like a pro.
The schooling cannot equip people with sufficient mental models tools to craft our deserved worldview of a many-sided man. The entire set of educational tools cannot be condensed into this small toolbox - labeled as "school".
Lara Melissa in this book leads you through:
The nature of mental models
The applications of mental models in real-life situations case studies that really work
How to stick the mental models to you the new way of thinking
Mental models are the best tools to help you to understand the world around you, place smart bets, and make the big decisions. And this book is for:
Decision-makers
Business practitioners and entrepreneurs
Writers, journalists, inquisitors, investigators, and researchers
Critical thinkers, psychotherapists, and educators
Parenting, personal development, and happiness
People have always been fascinated by how the mind works, and the mental models are the tools your mind needs for clear, faster, better reasoning, judgment, analysis, and learning. Mental Models Mastery enlarges the Lara Melissa teaching in Unf--k Yourself, Decluttering, and Be You Only Better.
©2019 Lara Melissa Leone (P)2019 M.Eugenio

A combination of two Congressional documents following whistleblower concerns over the transfer of nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia as part of President Donald Trump's Middle East Marshall Plan. In Feburary 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform released an interim report after multiple whistleblowers came forward to warn about efforts inside the White House to rush the transfer of highly sensitive U.S. nuclear technology in potential violation of the Atomic Energy Act. After the February report, more than 60,000 pages of new documents were obtained by the committee revealing how, as the report states, "the Trump Administration has virtually obliterated the lines normally separating government policymaking from corporate and foreign interests", documenting "the Administration's willingness to let private parties with close ties to the President wield outsized influence over U.S. policy towards Saudi Arabia", and questioning "whether the White House is willing to place the potential profits of the President’s friends above the national security of the American people".
©2020 Timberlane Media (P)2020 Timberlane Media